Evaluation of the optimal arrangement of rock bolts on the stability of jointed rockmass Using Three-Dimensional DFN-DEM Approach - Case study: Clab 2 cavern

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Dept. of Civil Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran

2 Dept. of Mining Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran

3 Dept. of mining engineering, Isfahan university of technology, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

 Summary
A novel procedure for selecting the optimal length of the rock bolts is developed, as the main supporting component in supporting underground structures. The data of the study is obtained from a Clab2 cavern in Sweden which includes six joint sets with different irregular geometric characteristics. A three-dimensional distinct element method along with discrete fracture network approach is utilized for the analyses. To support this blocky structure, rock bolts with lengths of 3, 6 and 9 meters were implemented. Technical and economic criteria have been used and the recommended pattern was 6-meter rock bolts with 2 meter spacing.
 
Introduction
The collapse of blocks is one of the most important issues in the stability and design of underground. However, most of the studies have been performed to stabilize the underground spaces by rock bolts in continuous environments with regular joint networks and in two dimensions. This study presents a procedure to investigate the stability of underground spaces in three dimensions in rock mass with irregular discontinuities by stochastic discrete fracture network (DFN) method evaluating the effect of bolt length and spacing on the stability of underground structures.

Methodology and Approaches
The purpose of this study is to provide a process to optimize the bolting pattern in the support system. For this, the geomechanical data of Clab2 cavern located in the Sympivarp region, Sweden was utilized. This cavern has a depth, length. Width and height of 30, 115, 21, and 27 meters with a horseshoe section. The joint studies in the area identified six joint sets around the cavern. Ten DFN realizations were generated along with different patterns of bolting systems with various lengths and spacing. The rock bolts used in this research have lengths of 3, 6 and 9 meters with a longitudinal and transverse distance of 2 meters.
 
Results and Conclusions
The effect of a particular supporting system on various discontinuity networks is different, which can be significantly effective or ineffective in some discontinuity networks. This shows the need to apply and examine support systems on different discontinuity networks to achieve the optimal pattern. In this study, a new trend is presented to achieve the optimal pattern based on the total volume of unstable blocks and the volume of which 80% of unstable blocks are smaller, along with the total length of the used bolts. The results show that the stability of the cavern in using the bolt support system does not necessarily increase using longer rock bolts. Initially, increasing the length of the bolts increases the stability, however after a certain length, increasing the length of the bolts no longer significantly improves the stability of the structure. Therefore, considering the economic criteria, the 6-meter model is the best model for stabilizing the desired cave.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

[1]                 Indraratna, B. and Kaiser, P.K., A.; 1990; “Design for grouted rock bolts based on the convergence control method” International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 269-281.
[2]                 Cai, Y.; Esaki, T.; Jiang, Y.; 2004; “A rock bolt and rock mass interaction model” International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, Vol. 41.7: pp. 1055-1067.
[3]                 Carranza-Torres, C.; 2009; “Analytical and numerical study of the mechanics of rockbolt reinforcement around tunnels in rock masses”. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, Vol. 42.2: pp. 175-228.
[4]                 Bobet, A.; 2009; “Elastic solution for deep tunnels. Application to excavation damage zone and rockbolt support”. Rock mechanics and rock engineering, Vol. 42.2, pp. 147-174.
[5]                 Sakurai, Sh.; 2010; “Modeling strategy for jointed rock masses reinforced by rock bolts in tunneling practice”. Acta Geotechnica, Vol. 5.2, pp. 121-126.
[6]                 Kaya, A.; Bulut, F.; and Sayin A.; 2011; “Analysis of support requirements for a tunnel portal in weak rock: A case study from Turkey”. Scientific Research and Essays, Vol. 6(31), pp.6566-6583.
[7]                 Lorig, L. J.; Varona, P.; 2013; “Guidelines for numerical modelling of rock support for mines.” Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Ground Support in Mining and Underground Construction. Australian Centre for Geomechanics, pp. 81-105.
[8]                 Cai, Y., Esaki, T. and Jiang, Y., 2004. “A rock bolt and rock mass interaction model”. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, Vol. 41(7), pp.1055-1067.
[9]                 Boon, C. W.; Houlsby, G. T.; Utili, S.; 2015; “Designing tunnel support in jointed rock masses via the DEM.” Rock mechanics and rock engineering, Vol. 48.2, pp. 603-632.
[10]              Shreedharan, S.; Kulatilake, P.; 2016; “Discontinuum–equivalent continuum analysis of the stability of tunnels in a deep coal mine using the distinct element method”. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, Vol. 49.5: pp. 1903-1922.
[11]              Liu, J.; Yang, H.; Wen, H.; and Zhou, X.; 2017; “Analytical model for the load transmission law of rock bolt subjected to open and sliding joint displacements.” International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, Vol. 100, pp.1-9.
[12]              Ma, S.; Zhao, Z.; Nie, W.; Zhu, X.; 2017; “An analytical model for fully grouted rockbolts with consideration of the pre-and post-yielding behavior.” Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, Vol. 50(11), pp.3019-3028.
[13]              Noroozi, M.; Rafiei, R.; Bajolvand, M.; & Hojati T. A.; 2018; “Investigate the effect of rock mass joint intensity on performance of support systems in the tunnel by using DFN-DEM numerical modeling (Case study: the access tunnel of Rudbar Lorestan Dam plant)”. Journal of Analytical and Numerical Methods in Mining Engineering, Vol. 8.16, pp. 13-27.
[14]              He, Sh.; Li, Y.; Aydin, A.; 2018; “A comparative study of UDEC simulations of an unsupported rock tunnel.” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 72, pp. 242-249.
[15]              Yokota, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Nie, W.; Date, K.; Iwano, K.; & Okada, Y.; 2019 “Experimental and numerical study on the interface behaviour between the rock bolt and bond material.” Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, Vol. 52(3), 869-879.
[16]              Boon, C. W.; 2019; “Study of reinforcement support mechanisms for wide-span horse-shoe-shaped openings in horizontally layered jointed rock using the distinct element method.” Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.” Vol. 52.4, pp. 1179-1191.
[17]              Das, R.; Singh, T. N.; 2020; “Effect of rock bolt support mechanism on tunnel deformation in jointed rockmass: a numerical approach.” Underground Space.
[18]              Li, C.; 2017; “Principles of rockbolting design.” Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 9.3: 396-414.
[19]              Nord, G.; Bagheri, M.; Baghbanan, A.; & Stille, H.; 2007; “Design consideration of large caverns by using advanced drilling equipment.” Felsbau, Vol. 25.5, pp. 131-136.
[20]              Bagheri, M. (2009). Model uncertainty of design tools to analyze block stability (Doctoral dissertation, KTH).
[21]              Li, C.C., 2017. Principles of rockbolting design. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 9(3), pp.396-414.
[22]              Merrien-Soukatchoff, V., Korini, T., & Thoraval, A. (2012). “Use of an integrated discrete fracture network code for stochastic stability analyses of fractured rock masses.” Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 45(2), 159-181.‏
[23]              Priest SD (1993) Discontinuity analysis for rock engineering, Chapman and Hall
[24]              Liu, J., Yang, H., Wen, H., & Zhou, X. (2017). Analytical model for the load transmission law of rock bolt subjected to open and sliding joint displacements. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 100, 1-9.‏
[25]              Itasca Consulting Group, Inc.; 2016; 3DEC — Three-Dimensional Distinct Element Code, Ver. 5.2. Minneapolis: Itasca.
[26]              Ma, S., Zhao, Z., Nie, W., & Zhu, X.; 2017; “An analytical model for fully grouted rockbolts with consideration of the pre-and post-yielding behavior.” Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, Vol. 50.11, pp. 3019-3028.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 21 January 2022
  • Revise Date: 08 April 2022
  • Accept Date: 25 May 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics