Estimation of the stability number and face pressure of the tunnel at the serviceability limit state based on the results of numerical modeling

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

Dept. of Mining Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Summary
In the evaluation of the face pressure in the serviceability limit state (SLS), volume loss and surface settlement are limited to acceptable values. In this paper, PLAXIS 3D software is used to estimate the face pressure in the serviceability limit state. In this regard, geometrical conditions (excavation diameter of 9 m) and geotechnical information in Tehran metro lines are considered in the numerical modeling. To validate the results of the modeling, the results of the settlement monitoring of the Southern Extension Tehran Metro Line 6 have been used. Using the characteristics of Young's modulus, groundwater level, and volume loss, three new equations and formulas for estimating the corresponding tunnel face stability number are proposed.

Introduction
Due to the lack of a suitable model for estimating tunnel face pressure in the serviceability limit state, a comprehensive research study is conducted for Tehran metro tunnels. In this context, by using numerical modeling with Plaxis 3D V20 software, as well as by performing validation and sensitivity analysis, and by considering the parameters affecting the surface settlement in the area of Tehran soils, a new method for estimating tunnel face pressure is provided in the serviceability limit state. This method is based on the statistical analysis of the results of 80 numerical models whose range of parameter values is adjusted according to the range of Tehran soil parameters.

Methodology and Approaches
In this research study, Plaxis 3D V20 software is used for numerical modeling. In the modeling stages, in order to make the modeling results closer to reality, the step-by-step construction process of tunnel excavation has been followed. In order to validate and check the correctness of the 3D numerical modeling, the data of the Southern Extension Tehran Metro Line 6, as well as the results of instrumentation and monitoring, have been used. In the end, multiple regression analysis has been used to investigate the combined effect of effective parameters on the tunnel face stability number using the results of numerical modeling.

Results and Conclusions
In the validation of numerical modeling, in geological sections whose settlement is less than 8 mm, modeling in an undrained state provides more consistent results with the actual settlement information. In the geological sections whose settlement is more than 8 mm, modeling in a drained state provides more consistent results with the actual settlement information. A new empirical formula for the estimation of the tunnel face stability number has been obtained using multiple regression methods in the drained state. The determination coefficient of this formula is 68%. Also, three formulas for estimating the stability number were obtained using simple regression formulas.

Keywords

Main Subjects


[1]                 Maidl, B., Herrenknecht, M., Maidl, U. & Wehrmeyer, G. (2012). Mechanised Shield Tunnelling, 2nd Edition Copyright © 2011 Ernst & Sohn, Verlag, Berlin, 475 pp.
[2]                 Guglielmetti, V., Grasso, P., Mahtab, A., Xu, Sh., "Mechanized Tunnelling in Urban Areas", Geodata S.P.A., Turin, Italy, 2117
[3]                 Horn, N., 1961. “Horizontal earth pressure on vertical end faces of tunnel tubes”. In the National Conference of the Hungarian Civil Engineering Industry, pp. 7-16.
[4]                 DIN 4085.2007-10. 2007. Soil - calculation of earth pressure Subsoil - calculation of earth pressure.
[5]                 Ebrahim.farrokh,2019, face pressure estimation report for the southern development project of Tehran metro line 6, bahrooi engineering company of Tehran  [in Persian]
[6]                 Ebrahim.farrokh, 2019, report on the executive arrangements for starting drilling in residential area in the southern development project of Tehran metro line 6, bahrooi engineering company of Tehran  [in Persian]
[7]                 Kimura, T., Mair, R.J. 1981. “Centrifugal testing of model tunnels in soft clay”. In. Proceedings of 10th
International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Stockholm, 15 –19 June 1981. Rotterdam. Balkema, pp. 319–22.
[8]                 Dimmock, P.S., Mair, R.J. 2007. “Estimating volume loss for open-face tunnels in London clay”. Proceedings of
the Institution of Civil Engineers, Geotechnical Engineering, UK, vol. 160, Issue GE1, pp. 13-22
[9]                 Herrenknecht, M., Thewes, M., Budach, Ch. 2011. “The development of earth pressure shields. from the beginning to the present”. Geomechanics and Tunnelling, No. 1, pp. 11-35.
[10]              Shirlaw, J.N., 2012. “Setting operating pressures for TBM tunneling”. Geotechnical Aspects of Tunnelling for Infrastructure Development, Hong Kong, pp. 7-28.
[11]              Broere, W. 2001. “Tunnel face stability and new CPT applications”. PhD Thesis, Delft University.
[12]              Proctor, R.V., White, T.L. 1977. Earth Tunnelling with Steel Supports. Commercial Shearing and Stamping Co, Youngstown, 247 p.
[13]              Zizka, Z., Thewes, M. 2016. Recommendations for face support pressure calculations for shield tunnelling in soft ground, German Tunnelling Committee, ITA-AITES.
[14]              cyber international company 2016,geological and geological engineering report  [in Persian]
[15]              a.bagheri, a.dehqhan., k.ahangari, repoeting the effect of operational parameters affecting ground subsidence in drilling with ground pressure balance device, south development tunnel of Tehran metro line 6, 2019  [in Persian]
[16]              cyber international company, geological report on the southern development project of Tehran metro line 6, 2017 [in Persian]