Dynamic Analysis of Anchored Diaphragm Walls

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

Dept. of Civil Engineering, Yazd University

10.29252/anm.8.15.83

Abstract

Summary
In this paper, the behavior of diaphragm walls with and without anchor have been studied. In addition to static loads, the walls were subjected to seismic load due to earthquake, using finite element program, PLAXIS 2D. Maximum displacement and bending moment of the wall were compared in different cases.
 
Introduction
Deep excavations in urban areas require not only the stability of retained soil, but also special attentions due to the nearby existing buildings. They must be designed in such a way that the requirements for both ultimate and serviceability limit state for supporting system and neighboring structures are satisfied. Anchored diaphragm walls are one of the safest lateral supports, which help in overall stability of the excavated areas. Diaphragm walls represent in general a considerably more complex problem than gravity or cantilever walls.
 
 Methodology and Approaches
The wall displacement, maximum bending moment and anchor extreme force were calculated using a dynamic PLAXIS finite element program. The soil was considered as elasto-plastic material, using Mohr–Coulomb constitutive model.  The wall and the anchor were considered to behave elastically. Considering the dynamic applied load, absorbent boundaries were assumed to prevent dynamic wave reflection.  Three different historical strong motions namely, Tabas, Bam and Roodbar were applied to the wall. The following outputs were obtained for different excavation geometry and mechanical properties for soil.
 
Results and Conclusions
general results can be drawn as following: 1-Change in the soil stiffness (modulus of elasticity and cohesion) from soft to stiff has caused the maximum wall displacement and bending moment to increase by 76% and 20%, respectively. 2- Under dynamic load, the maximum lateral displacement of the wall is at its maximum value, while the static wall displacement is maximum at about one third the wall height measured from its toe. 3-Peak ground acceleration has direct effect on maximum wall displacement and bending moment, while earthquake frequency has inversely changed these output parameters. Based on the obtained results 30% increase in earthquake acceleration has caused the maximum wall displacement increase by 15%. 4- The maximum displacement and bending moments increased noticeably under earthquake load. Therefore, for diaphragm walls in earthquake prone area, dynamic case should be considered in design. Albeit, building codes, accept higher displacement and bending moments under exceptional loadings.

Keywords

Main Subjects


[1]           Gazetas, G. Psarropoulos, P. N., Anastasopoulos, I., Gerolymos, N. (2004). “Seismic behaviour of flexible retaining systems subjected to short-duration moderately strong excitation”, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 24:537–550.
[2]           Mir Mohammad hosieni, S.M. (2008). “The Principles of Soil Dynamicˮ, International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology. (In Persian).
[3]           Ostadan, F. (2008). “Seismic Soil Pressure for Building Walls-An Updated Approachˮ, Bechtel Technology Journal, Volume 1, Number 1.
[4]           Nogami, T. (1993). “Waterfront Sheet Pile Walls Subjected to Earthquake Shaking: Analysis methodˮ, Scripps institution of Oceanography University of California at SanDiego. La Jolla. CA 92093.
[5]           Zeng, X. and Steedman, R.S. (1993). “On the Behavior of Quay Walls in Earthquakesˮ, Geotechnique. 43(3), 417–431.
[6]           Fanchin, P. and Pinto, P.E. (2008). “Analysis of Diaphragm-type Bridge Abutments and After Seismic Upgradingˮ, 1st US-Italy seismic bridge workshop.
[7]           Gol Pazir, I. Akhlaghi, T. (2008). “The Effect of Various Parameters on The Behavior of Cantilever Diaphragm Wall Using The Finite Element Method and Limit Equilibriumˮ. Fifth National Congress of Civil Engineering. Ferdowsi University. Mashhad. (In Persian).
[8]           Choudhury, D. Sitharam, T. G. Subba Rao, K. S. (2004). “Seismic Design of Earth-Retaining Structures and Foundationsˮ. Current Science. Vol. 87. No. 10. pp. 1417-1425.
[9]           Kramer, SL. (1996). “Geotechnical Earthquake Engineeringˮ. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River. NJ. 1996.
[10]         Kamal Mohamed Hafez Ismail Ibrahim., Tarek Esmat Ibrahim. (2013). “Effect of historical earthquakes on pre-stressed anchortie back diaphragm wall and on near-by building”, HBRC Journal 9, 60–67.
[11]         Ou, C. Y. (2006). “Deep Excavation, Theory and Practiceˮ, Taylor & Francis, Nethelands.
[12]         Thomas, D. R.; Jr, P. E. (2006). “Diaphragm Wallˮ, Central PA Geotechnical Conference, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
[13]         Ali Elahi, H. (2011). “In-situ Concrete Diaphragm Walls Designed on The Basis of Their Seismic Performanceˮ. Fourth International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering Iran. Iranian Geotechnical Society, Tehran. (In Persian).
[14]         Gill-Martin, L. M., Hernandez, E., Shin, M and Aschheim, M. (2012). “Developments in Excavation Bracing Systemsˮ, Journal of tunnelling and underground space technology, Elsevier. 31:107–116.
[15]         Plaxis 3D Foundation Vol1.6 User Manual: (2004).  Delft University of Technology & Plaxis BV. Delft. Netherland.
[16]         Sabatini, P., Pass, J. D.; Bachus, R. C. (1999). “Ground Anchors and Anchored Systemsˮ,GeoSyntec Consultants 1100 Lake Hearn Drive Atlanta, Georgia.Resources Center Directors Division Administrators Federal Lands Highway Division Engineers. Washington D.C. 20590.
[17]         Kamal Mohamed Hafez Ismail Ibrahim, Tarek Esmat Ibrahim. (2013). “Effect of Historical Earthquakes on Pre-Stressed Anchor Tie Back Diaphragm Wall and on Near-by Building ˮ. Housing and Building National Research Center. Production and Hosting by Elsevier B.V. All Rights Reserved.
[18]         Permanent Committee for Revising the Iranian Code of Practice for Sismic Resistant Design of Buildings. (2014). “Iranian Code of Practice for Sismic Resistant Design of Buildings Standard 2800, 4th Editionˮ. Road, Housing and Urban Development Research Center, Tehran, Iran. (In Persian).